While you’re stressing out about whether your remote is working — Why hasn’t she sent an update? Why isn’t she on chat? —your remote could be stressing out about whether you trust that she’s working. And ironically, these doubts could be taking up precious time and mental space for both of you.
Instead of letting your worry distract you and potentially harm your relationship with your direct report, or even her performance, take action.
Remote team members force managers to confront the extent to which they’ve been letting sheer face time bias their views of a direct report’s productivity. Seeing a co-located direct report work late or through lunch, for example, doesn’t actually say much about her efficiency. Yet it could lead you to think she’s getting more done than a remote team member — someone whose effort isn’t visible to you.
To fight this potential bias, make a list of what your remote has accomplished in the last month or quarter. Don’t rely on your memory, which is prone to highlight and corroborate your fears. Instead, objectively assemble the facts: Go back to old emails, lists of goals from planning meetings and performance reviews, and task updates in project management tools.
Even if you do notice a drop in production — your remote is completing fewer support tickets this month compared to last, for example — consider whether it really indicates he or she hasn’t been working enough. Could it be that his or her output the past two months was unsustainably high, meaning what you now see is only a return to normalcy?
If you do uncover evidence of underperformance, you’ll need to address the cause, whether it’s a motivation issue or skill gap.
If you don’t trust your remote, it’s all too easy to use the physical distance as an excuse to disengage with the person. Maybe you delegate fewer assignments, check in less frequently, or hold off on providing tough feedback or development opportunities.
That only compounds the problem. First, a weak relationship with you — the person’s main connection to the company — might de-motivate him and hamper his performance. Second, if his output really is suffering, he needs more attention from you, not less. And third, when you stop trusting someone with important work, you give him fewer opportunities to prove himself, creating a vicious cycle of low expectations yielding low performance.
To build or rebuild trust with your remote, try:
Every organization has its own culture around remote work. To better navigate yours, turn to the knowledge bank that’s already all around you: your peers. All the better if you can find a manager of remotes whose roles are similar to the one your remote holds. You’re more likely to find such a peer if you’re consistently developing a strong internal peer network.
Once you book time with experienced peers, you could ask questions like:
Try out what seems relevant to your situation. Then share how it goes with your peers to help refine and reinforce effective management practices across your organization.
What if your remote thinks his or her work is exactly what you’re looking for — when it’s not? This is more common than you might think.
The problem often lies in how you’ve set and enforced (or failed to set and enforce) performance expectations, which can be especially tricky with remotes. For example, a co-located direct report can often turn around, point to his draft customer report, and ask you, “How’s this looking?” to be sure he’s on track. But it’s much tougher for a remote to have these kinds of spontaneous exchanges that might not seem like much as they’re happening, but can go a long way toward aligning expectations between a manager and direct report.
In addition to going over instructions carefully with your remote, try:
No manager wants to play the role of parole officer, using the pretense of a quick check-in to confirm a remote is working — that makes the shortlist for ways to damage trust. But consider what a difference establishing communication expectations upfront can make: If you’ve preemptively agreed to share updates at certain intervals, what might otherwise come off as micromanaging becomes something routine, a natural part of your working relationship and the whole team’s culture.
To set and uphold expectations around how, and how often, your remote provides progress reports, consider:
Maybe you need to see a remote’s work, not just hear about it, to take the guesswork out of what the person is getting done. And when you visually review work together during a check-in, you create the opportunity for a back-and-forth discussion that can be used for feedback, coaching, and development. Screen-sharing could also circumvent cultural or language barriers. There’s less to interpret if you’re both looking at the same thing, versus inferring progress from tone and your or your remote’s understanding of a second language.
If you’ll need time to review the work before the check-in, be sure you give your remote enough advance notice.